« E-Proxies Examined at This Year's SEC Speaks
Submitted by: Mark Saltzburg, Associate Counsel
| Main | Update on French Poison Pills
Submitted by: Fassil Michael, Director of Custom Research »

Daily Posts

February 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29

Email Alerts

Subscribe and receive email alerts when new articles are published!

Enter Your Email Address

Contact Us

Email us with any questions, or a topic you would like to see discussed

EMAIL US

Links

Monday, March 13, 2006

Sudan Divestment Campaign Continues
Submitted by: Jan Fetter-Degges, Social Issues Service Senior Research Analyst

Pending Legislation
The Sudan divestment campaign, which included the consideration of divestment bills in one-fifth of U.S. state legislatures in 2005, shows no signs of tiring in 2006. Bills introduced in 2005 in New York, North Carolina and Vermont are still pending, and new bills could be introduced in Maryland (where a bill died in committee in 2005) and Massachusetts. In 2005, Illinois and New Jersey enacted laws mandating divestment of state funds from companies doing business in Sudan, while Arizona, Louisiana and Oregon passed laws encouraging divestment, and the California legislature passed a resolution encouraging the state's public pension systems to encourage companies doing business in Sudan to work to safeguard human rights. California's Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS) has been studying the issue, meeting this winter with representatives from several companies with major investments in Sudan.

University Update
In the past four weeks alone, Yale and Brown have agreed to divest of some of their assets in Sudan, with Brown pledging total divestment and Yale divesting from seven oil companies and Sudanese government bonds (but retaining the possibility of holding stock in other companies with business in Sudan). Later this month, the University of California regents will meet to discuss Sudan divestment. Schools including Harvard, Stanford, Amherst and Dartmouth have already enacted divestment policies (in many cases choosing to divest of only a handful of companies that are major players in Sudan's oil industry), and students are pressuring the administrations of many other schools to consider divestment.

Comments

After doing a fair amount of research--and remembering what college campuses were like back during the South Africa divestiture debates--I state several points for consideration:

1. The wealth effect to stakeholders from getting companies they own [in their portfolios--directly or indirectly--i.e. pensions] to divest is inversely related to the SIZE & ASSETS of the aforementioned companies. the wealth effect to shareholders who own a large-cap like Royal Dutch or an ExxonMobile would be negligible if the companies were to divest their holdings in Sudan. The reason is that they have HUGE OIL ASSETS/RESERVES ALL OVER THE GLOBE! Now if a small-cap company were wildcatting in Sudan--divesting could be devastating-esp. if a block they leased struck it big!

2. Getting pensions to divest their holdings from Sudan-linked Companies will have little material effect on the price of the stock. In today's global markets--there are plenty of Chinese or others with such respect for human rights that would gladly step up and buy the sold shares.

3. Sudan Divestment campaign should also focus on social change--holding companies accountable for righting their moral compasses. Continued press coverage means everything in todays' 60-second world.

4. One should not confuse divestment with investment!

www.10qdetective.blogspot.com

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.riskmetrics.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/36

   
 
About RiskMetrics Group | Disclaimer

Copyright © 2007 RiskMetrics Group


Powered by Movable Type 3.36